<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>timburrell.net &#187; KDE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timburrell.net/tag/kde/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timburrell.net</link>
	<description>All that is Tim Burrell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 01:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>KDE 4.2: The Answer?</title>
		<link>http://timburrell.net/blog/2009-01-31/kde-42-the-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://timburrell.net/blog/2009-01-31/kde-42-the-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timburrell.net/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used my share of window managers and desktop environments over the years; I think the progression went something like this: DOS (single window?) -> DESQview -> Windows 3.1 through WinNT -> WindowMaker -> Enlightenment -> IceWM -> Fluxbox -> E17 -> XFce -> KDE 3.x -> KDE 3.x with Compiz-Fusion -> Gnome + Compiz, [...]</p>

<div class="sociable">
<div class="sociable_tagline">
<strong>Share this article:</strong>
</div>

	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:?subject=KDE%204.2%3A%20The%20Answer%3F&amp;body=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F" title="E-mail this story to a friend!"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/email_link.png" title="E-mail this story to a friend!" alt="E-mail this story to a friend!" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F&amp;title=KDE%204.2%3A%20The%20Answer%3F" title="Reddit"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/reddit.png" title="Reddit" alt="Reddit" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F&amp;title=KDE%204.2%3A%20The%20Answer%3F" title="StumbleUpon"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/stumbleupon.png" title="StumbleUpon" alt="StumbleUpon" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F&amp;title=KDE%204.2%3A%20The%20Answer%3F" title="Digg"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/digg.png" title="Digg" alt="Digg" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F" title="Technorati"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/technorati.png" title="Technorati" alt="Technorati" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://slashdot.org/bookmark.pl?title=KDE%204.2%3A%20The%20Answer%3F&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F" title="Slashdot"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/slashdot.png" title="Slashdot" alt="Slashdot" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F&amp;title=KDE%204.2%3A%20The%20Answer%3F" title="del.icio.us"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/delicious.png" title="del.icio.us" alt="del.icio.us" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F&amp;t=KDE%204.2%3A%20The%20Answer%3F" title="Facebook"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/facebook.png" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F&amp;title=KDE%204.2%3A%20The%20Answer%3F&amp;source=timburrell.net+All+that+is+Tim+Burrell&amp;summary=I%27ve%20used%20my%20share%20of%20window%20managers%20and%20desktop%20environments%20over%20the%20years%3B%20I%20think%20the%20progression%20went%20something%20like%20this%3A%20DOS%20%28single%20window%3F%29%20-%3E%20DESQview%20-%3E%20Windows%203.1%20through%20WinNT%20-%3E%20WindowMaker%20-%3E%20Enlightenment%20-%3E%20IceWM%20-%3E%20Fluxbox%20-%3E%20E17%20" title="LinkedIn"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/linkedin.png" title="LinkedIn" alt="LinkedIn" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://twitthis.com/twit?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F" title="TwitThis"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/twitter.png" title="TwitThis" alt="TwitThis" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>
	<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=edit&amp;bkmk=http%3A%2F%2Ftimburrell.net%2Fblog%2F2009-01-31%2Fkde-42-the-answer%2F&amp;title=KDE%204.2%3A%20The%20Answer%3F" title="Google"><img src="http://timburrell.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/googlebookmark.png" title="Google" alt="Google" class="sociable-hovers" /></a>

</div>
<small><em>posted in <a href="http://timburrell.net/topics/blog/">Blog</a> by Tim. <a href="http://timburrell.net/blog/2009-01-31/kde-42-the-answer/#comments">Leave a Comment</a><br />&copy;2010 <a href="http://timburrell.net">timburrell.net</a>. All Rights Reserved.</em></small>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used my share of window managers and desktop environments over the years; I think the progression went something like this: DOS (single window?) -> DESQview -> Windows 3.1 through WinNT -> WindowMaker -> Enlightenment -> IceWM -> Fluxbox -> E17 -> XFce -> KDE 3.x -> KDE 3.x with Compiz-Fusion -> Gnome + Compiz, and now back to KDE 4.2.  From time to time I have also been known to use WinXP, Vista, and OS X.  Basically, I&#8217;ve tried enough of them to know what I like and do not like.</p>
<p>Up until the 4.0 release I had become an avid KDE user.  Like most people, however, I was pretty dismayed at their choice to tag a feature incomplete, and horribly buggy release as 4.0.  Yes they did come out and say it wasn&#8217;t ready for mass consumption yet, but they pretty much blew it by tagging it as 4.0, when really it was an early, early beta, or perhaps an alpha release &#8212; I won&#8217;t go on about since it&#8217;s already been <a href="http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2009/01/choices-and-punishment.html">discussed to death</a>.  KDE 3.5 held up fairly well for a while, but eventually Gnome surpassed it in terms of features, stability, and it remained lightweight yet had nice integration with Compiz, meaning I could still appease my inherent fascination with shiny things.  So, I begrudgingly left KDE behind.</p>
<p>And now, KDE 4.2 is here, which is being touted as &#8220;The Answer&#8221; to all the critics.  So is it?</p>
<p>First let me say that it really is a great release.  It&#8217;s what a 4.0 beta should have been.  It&#8217;s [mostly] stable, and [mostly] feature complete in comparison to 3.5.  The new API changes are awesome &#8212; it&#8217;s an absolute joy to develop for.  It&#8217;s got a solid foundation, and what they&#8217;ve built from it really is a technical achievement &#8212; they should be proud of their efforts.  All the KDE4 applications have a consistent UI feel, and they all work in exactly the way you&#8217;d expect with regards to things like some of the more advanced drag &#8216;n drop features that OS X has supported for years (and that Microsoft still hasn&#8217;t caught on to).</p>
<p>My favorite thing: its window management is absolutely top notch.  I thought nothing could beat Compiz, but the new KWin is pretty much perfect.  It strikes a great balance between configurability and simplicity.  The average user will never know 90% of the things it can do, but for those picky people among us it offers things like: an excellent focus-follows-mouse implementation, the ability to be able to easily set individual windows as on-top or below-others, and the ability to disable or enable window decorations on case by case basis, and that&#8217;s just for starters.  KWin does everything I want, and more, yet it doesn&#8217;t suffer from the insane configuration and menu nightmare that is the Compiz configuration tool.</p>
<p>All that being said, my answer to the question is still a definitive &#8220;no&#8221;.  KDE 4.2 is not The Answer.  I am back in Gnome right now due to bugs.  I really like konsole but the toggle that disables the menubar does not work, nor does the toggle that disables blinking text.  There&#8217;s still no native network manager for those with wireless connections.  The list of, admittedly minor, complaints goes on at length, and while none of them are a really big deal on their own, as a whole they leave me with a bad aftertaste in mouth&#8230; a taste that is reminiscent of an x.0 beta release, and not a .2 release.</p>
<p>However, this release does at least give me hope.  I have faith in the KDE developers, and believe that their cause is a good one and a worthy one.  They&#8217;re creating an excellent new foundation for what should become a consistent and unified interface experience &#8212; something Linux has sorely been lacking since the great KDE and Gnome divide began.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://timburrell.net/blog/2009-01-31/kde-42-the-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
